Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4503594 Biological Control 2016 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Mole cricket biological control minimized Florida pasture losses due to this pest.•The perpetual economic benefit had a benefit-cost ratio of 52:1.•The highly successful mole cricket biological control required 34 years to complete.•Mole cricket biological control is part of ongoing integrated pest management.•Publicly funded mole cricket biological control was a prudent investment.

The Mole Cricket Biological Control Program (MCBCP) is a compelling example of successfully managing alien invasive pests that warrants formal analysis and documentation of its effectiveness and benefits relative to costs for cattlemen in the southeastern U.S. Three biological control agents that parasitize the short-winged mole cricket, Neoscapteriscus abbreviatus (Scudder); tawny mole cricket, Neoscapteriscus vicinus (Scudder); and southern mole cricket, Neoscapteriscus borellii (Giglio-Tos) (Orthoptera: Gryllotalpidae) were imported from the origin of the pests in South America, tested for non-target affects, and distributed widely in Florida. Larra bicolor F. (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae), a parasitoid of large nymph and adult mole crickets, was collected in Bolivia and established in Florida in 1988–89, and later in Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi. Another parasitoid of large mole crickets, Ormia depleta (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tachinidae), was introduced several times from Brazil during the early 1980s and released extensively. An entomopathogenic nematode discovered in Uruguay, Steinernema scapterisci (Nematoda: Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) reproduces within adult mole crickets, building up large populations that infect additional mole crickets and ultimately creates an epidemic. This very effective biological control agent was applied to pastures, turf farms, golf courses, athletic fields, and other mole cricket habitats across Florida after in vitro culture was developed and a commercial product, “Nematac® S,” became available. During the 34 years of the MCBCP (1979–2012), about $8.7 million was spent on faculty salaries and operating costs and the overall annual savings in control costs was estimated to be $13.6 million; a first year benefit-cost ratio of 1.6:1. Applying a 3% social discount rate (perpetual benefit), the MCBCP will save cattle producers $453 million for a long-term benefit-cost ratio of 52:1.

Graphical abstractFigure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide

Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Agronomy and Crop Science
Authors
, , , ,