Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
4507694 | Crop Protection | 2008 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
Four field trials were conducted over a two-year period at Exeter (2005, 2006), Harrow (2006) and Ridgetown (2006), Ontario to evaluate the tolerance of pinto and Small Red Mexican (SRM) beans to the pre-emergence application of dimethenamid-p at 693 and 1386 g ai haâ1, s-metolachlor at 1600 and 3200 g ai haâ1, pyroxasulfone at 209 and 418 g ai haâ1, imazethapyr at 75 and 150 g ai haâ1, linuron at 1125 and 2250 g ai haâ1, flumetsulam at 70 and 140 g ai haâ1 and cloransulam-methyl at 35 and 70 g ai haâ1. All treatments including the non-treated control were maintained weed free during the growing season. Dimethenamid-p and s-metolachlor, especially at high doses, caused up to 19% visual injury to pinto and SRM, but these injuries were transient and had no effect on maturity and yield. Pyroxasulfone and linuron caused as much as 33% visual injury and reduced plant height, shoot dry weight and yield by up to 29, 36 and 25%, respectively. Imazethapyr, flumetsulam and cloransulam-methyl caused less than 5% visual injury and had no adverse effect on plant height, shoot dry weight, seed moisture content and yields of pinto and SRM beans. Based on these results dimethenamid-p, s-metolachlor, imazethapyr, flumetsulam and cloransulam-methyl applied pre-emergence have potential for inclusion in a weed management program for pinto and SRM beans. However, pyroxasulfone and linuron, applied pre-emergence at the doses evaluated do not have an adequate margin of crop safety for use in pinto and SRM bean production.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Agronomy and Crop Science
Authors
Peter H. Sikkema, Darren E. Robinson, Robert E. Nurse, Nader Soltani,