Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4524889 Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 2013 6 Pages PDF
Abstract

The ghost ant, Tapinoma melanocephalum (F.), is a household pest and a considerable nuisance. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the toxicity and control efficacy of boric acid in liquid bait against queen and worker ghost ants. The LT50 values for workers fed with 0.5%–2.5% boric acid and 2% chicken peptone in 20% sucrose water solutions were 4.3–2.4 days. The lethal times (LT50 = 5.2–7.6 days) for queen ghost ants fed with various concentrations of a boric acid solution depended on the feeding behavior of the queens. The high boric acid (4%) content solutions were not repellent to the ghost ant workers. The liquid bait formulation of 1% boric acid, which caused a 100% worker, brood, and queen population reduction in 4, 4, and 5 weeks, respectively, was significantly more effective than the solid bait formulation containing the same concentration (p ≦ 0.05). The simulation tests involved using chicken peptone and sucrose as the attractant, and colonies were provided an alternate food source (20% sucrose solution and dog food) to achieve a more accurate assessment of bait acceptability in screening for the efficacy of the liquid boric acid bait. The control efficiency attained 99.9% in week 4. The results demonstrated that liquid bait, containing 2% chicken peptone, 20% sucrose as a food attractant, and 1% boric acid as the toxin, is efficient and highly recommended for ghost ant control.

Graphical abstractFigure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slideHighlights► The boric acid liquid bait is toxic to worker, queen and brood of the ghost ants. ► The control efficacy for queen may be varied by the amount of bait ingested. ► Liquid ant baits will completely destroy the remnant queen to avoid rebound. ► Using 2% chicken peptone is very attractive to ghost ants. ► Liquid boric acid bait formulation is an effective control strategy for ghost ants.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Animal Science and Zoology
Authors
, ,