Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4959092 Computers & Operations Research 2017 12 Pages PDF
Abstract
Workshop participants usually face time pressure to make a decision. Decision support can be provided by flagging options for which further agreement on their scores seems particularly valuable. By valuable, we mean the opportunity to identify other options as dominated (using preference programming) without having their precise scores agreed beforehand. The present paper quantifies this Value of Agreement and extends the concept to portfolio decision analysis and criterion weights. The new concept is validated through a case study in recruitment.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Computer Science Computer Science (General)
Authors
,