Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5050223 Ecological Economics 2013 10 Pages PDF
Abstract

The economic analysis of global warming is dominated by models based on optimal growth theory. These representative-agent models have an intrinsic distributional bias in favor of the rich. The bias is compounded by the use of 'revenue-neutrality' in the allocation of emission permits. The result is mitigation recommendations that are biased downwards.

► Integrated assessment models in the Nordhaus tradition have an intrinsic distributional bias against the poor. ► The bias reduces the 'optimal' amount of mitigation. ► Standard assumptions about the allocation of emission permits aggravate the distributional bias.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Authors
, ,