Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5050223 | Ecological Economics | 2013 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
The economic analysis of global warming is dominated by models based on optimal growth theory. These representative-agent models have an intrinsic distributional bias in favor of the rich. The bias is compounded by the use of 'revenue-neutrality' in the allocation of emission permits. The result is mitigation recommendations that are biased downwards.
⺠Integrated assessment models in the Nordhaus tradition have an intrinsic distributional bias against the poor. ⺠The bias reduces the 'optimal' amount of mitigation. ⺠Standard assumptions about the allocation of emission permits aggravate the distributional bias.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Authors
Peter Skott, Leila Davis,