| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5050415 | Ecological Economics | 2012 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
⺠Income of CFUGs is dependent on larger forest areas with valuable timber species. ⺠CFUGs spend 45.2% of their total expenditure on public service and infrastructure. ⺠The CFUGs expenditure pattern is highly skewed. ⺠Current taxation system limits the public finance potential of community forestry.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Authors
Bir Bahadur Khanal Chhetri, Jens Friis Lund, Ãystein Juul Nielsen,