| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 523192 | Journal of Informetrics | 2012 | 9 Pages |
We propose two new indices that are able to measure a scientific researcher's overall influence and the level of his/her works’ association with the mainstream research subjects within a scientific field. These two new measures – the total influence index and the mainstream index – differ from traditional performance measures such as the simple citation count and the h-index in that they take into account the indirect influence of an author's work. Indirect influence describes a scientific publication's impact upon subsequent works that do not reference it directly. The two measures capture indirect influence information from the knowledge emanating paths embedded in the citation network of a target scientific field. We take the Hirsch index, data envelopment analysis, and lithium iron phosphate battery technology field to examine the characteristics of these two measures. The results show that the total influence index favors earlier researchers and successfully highlights those researchers who have made crucial contributions to the target scientific field. The mainstream index, in addition to underlining total influence, also spotlights active researchers who enter into a scientific field in a later development stage. In summary, these two new measures are valuable complements to traditional scientific performance measures.
► The t-index measures a scientific researcher's total influence. ► The m-index measures the level of association with the mainstream research subjects. ► We take three scientific fields to examine the characteristics of the two measures. ► The results show that the t-index successfully credits high-contributing scientists. ► The m-index spotlights active researchers who enter into a field in a later stage.
