Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5539772 | Behavioural Processes | 2017 | 38 Pages |
Abstract
Two competing predictions of matching theory and an evolutionary theory of behavior dynamics, and one additional prediction of the evolutionary theory, were tested in a critical experiment in which human participants worked on concurrent schedules for money (Dallery et al., 2005). The three predictions concerned the descriptive adequacy of matching theory equations, and of equations describing emergent equilibria of the evolutionary theory. Tests of the predictions falsified matching theory and supported the evolutionary theory.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Animal Science and Zoology
Authors
J.J McDowell, Olivia L. Calvin, Ryan Hackett, Bryan Klapes,