Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
5761350 | Field Crops Research | 2017 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
The DSSAT (Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer) is the most widely used model package to characterize growth, development, yield, and N uptake of multiple crop species. The objectives of this study were: 1) to evaluate the performance of the maize (Zea mays L.) models CSM-CERES and CSM-IXIM available in DSSAT version 4.5, when simulating high yield conditions, 2) to test the IXIM model with an alternative approach to estimate crop N demand, based on Plénet and Lemaire (2000), and 3) with this alternative approach, examine some options to simulate grain N concentration. The two models were evaluated with data collected from two experimental fields in Almacelles, Spain, during three consecutive years under various N management treatments, combining fertilization and residue handling. Fertilization treatments included two doses of mineral fertilizer: 300 kg N haâ1 (N300), along with a N-free fertilized control (N0). Crop residues were either removed (R) or incorporated (I). The grain yields obtained in the fields (14% moisture) varied, depending on the N fertilization, from 11 to 20 Mg haâ1. In our high yielding irrigated maize conditions, both models were able to simulate grain yield and biomass accurately, with RRMSE of 9.5 and 11.4% for CERES and 14.9 and 14.3% for IXIM respectively. Estimations of N uptake were also accurate, with RRMSE of 12.0 and 8.6% for CERES and IXIM. The IXIM model with the alternative approach to estimate crop N demand simulated grain yield and crop N uptake better than the IXIM with the current approach based on Jones (1983). The RMSE was reduced by 22% for yield and by 55% for biomass, while the simulated N uptake reduced the RMSE by 12%. With this alternative approach, the best grain N simulations were obtained with a modification of the Ciampitti and Vyn (2013) function.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Agronomy and Crop Science
Authors
A. Yakoub, J. Lloveras, A. Biau, J.L. Lindquist, J.I. Lizaso,