Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
6292491 Ecological Complexity 2015 7 Pages PDF
Abstract
Clonal plants in highly disturbed habitats are often broken into small fragments of various sizes and buried at various soil depths. As a storage organ, rhizome fragments play an important role in enabling plants to survive in such habitats. But few studies have been concerned about the regenerative capacity of rhizome fragments of clonal shrubs of different rhizome diameter and at different burial depths. Here, we investigated whether deeper burial decreased, and diameter of the rhizome fragment increased, the regenerative capacity of a clonal shrub. Research samples of rhizome fragment (rhizome diameters of 2, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm) of the clonal shrub Calligonum arborescens were buried at different depths (0, 1, 5, 10, and 20 cm). Increasing the diameter of the rhizome fragments significantly increased the survival rate of fragments, and increased the above-ground, below-ground and total biomass production of fragments. Vegetative reproduction ability also increased with an increase in diameter of the rhizome fragments. With an increase in sand burial depth, above-ground, below-ground, total biomass production and vegetative reproduction ability first decreased and then increased, and no fragments survived at the 0 cm burial depth. These results indicate that sand burial depth and diameter of the rhizome fragments significantly affected the regeneration capacity of C. arborescens. Sand burial is one of the essential prerequisites for C. arborescens rhizome fragments' survival. Moderate burial depth (5 cm) and larger fragment diameter (20 mm diameter) were more suitable for biomass production and vegetative reproduction. These results indicate that reserves stored in rhizome fragments can contribute greatly to the regeneration capacity of the C. arborescens-responses that are very important for C. arborescens survival and establishment in frequently disturbed habitats.
Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Authors
, ,