Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6300937 | Biological Conservation | 2013 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
⺠We compare dung density and fecal DNA based animal population monitoring methods. ⺠We examine accuracy, precision, and cost-effectiveness. ⺠DNA based methods provide more precise estimates, more quickly, and at lower cost. ⺠DNA based methods can also be used when dung density methods are impracticable. ⺠DNA based methods should contribute significantly to the management of many species.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Authors
Simon Hedges, Arlyne Johnson, Marissa Ahlering, Martin Tyson, Lori S. Eggert,