| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6301029 | Biological Conservation | 2013 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
⺠We compare current and historic geographic range size as extinction risk predictors. ⺠Current range size strongly predicts risk while historic range size does not. ⺠Latent extinction risk is underestimated from models based on current range size. ⺠Current range size as a predictor of species decline rates suffers from circularity. ⺠Small range size is not inherently linked with rapid rates of decline.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Authors
Emily Hanna, Marcel Cardillo,