Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6379442 | Applied Animal Behaviour Science | 2015 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
Accelerometers (Actical® 'Mini Mitter' (MMA)) have been used to assess the activity of domestic cats (Felis catus), and have been validated against measures of observed activity in this species; however, previous validation trials have had very small sample sizes and have not considered inter-individual variation. The present study aimed to quantify the magnitude of inter-individual variation by validating MMAs against observed activity in a larger number of cats. A total of 288Â h of concurrent MMA and observed activity data (percentage of time spent active) were collected from 12 cats and assessed using four defined sampling periods: 1Â min, 1Â h, 6Â h and the 1Â h moving average at 10Â min intervals. There was a strong linear correlation (PÂ <Â 0.001) between MMA and observed activity data for the combined data set for all four sampling periods; however, there was considerable variation between cats. The MMA and observed activity data of individual cats were also highly correlated over the 10Â min (range of Pearson's correlations: 0.65-0.98, PÂ <Â 0.001), 1Â h (0.68-1.0, PÂ <Â 0.001), 6Â h (0.92-1.0, PÂ <Â 0.05, except for cat 12 where PÂ >Â 0.05) and 1Â h moving average (0.81-0.99, PÂ <Â 0.001) sampling intervals. The 1Â h moving average at 10Â min intervals appeared to be the best sampling interval as it maximised the strength of the correlation while maintaining sufficient information to follow patterns of activity over the 24Â h. Ultimately, the current study showed that MMAs can be used to accurately quantify the activity of domestic cats; however, there was a considerable amount of variation between cats, and thus each cat should be considered independently and serve as their own control when assessing any changes in activity levels.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Animal Science and Zoology
Authors
Christopher J. Andrews, Murray A. Potter, David G. Thomas,