Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6544784 | Forest Policy and Economics | 2018 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
More than ten years after REDDÂ + (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation) entered the UN climate negotiations, its current state and future direction are a matter of contention. This paper analyses 162 INDCs (Intended National Determined Contributions), or climate action plans, to assess whether and how countries plan to use REDDÂ + in their implementation the Paris Agreement. Our analysis suggests that REDDÂ + continues to have political traction. Many tropical countries still have expectations of REDDÂ +, and hope that public and private donors will support chronically underfunded domestic conservation programs. However, the expectations are not formulated in detail. We argue that until the questions of how to finance REDDÂ + and how to deal with the drivers of deforestation are resolved, REDD is unlikely to move quickly from formulated INDCs plans to implementation on the ground.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Forestry
Authors
Jonas Hein, Alejandro Guarin, Ezra Frommé, Pieter Pauw,