Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6547609 | Land Use Policy | 2016 | 13 Pages |
Abstract
The research found that hybrid plans predominated, and that over time a greater reliance on risk adverse drafting approaches created a quasi-prohibition plan, the exact opposite of what was intended by the IPA. This paper concludes that the drafting of the IPA and absence of plan-making guidance contributed to lack of shared understanding about the intended direction of the new planning system and resulted in many administrative interpretations of the legislation. It was a planning direction that tried too hard to be different, and as a result created a perception of land use risk and uncertainty that caused a return to more prescriptive and inflexible plan-making methods.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Forestry
Authors
Travis Frew, Douglas Baker, Paul Donehue,