Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6556387 | Ecosystem Services | 2018 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
Respondents considered provisioning services most important, but also valued cultural and regulating services. Institutions and social identity had the largest impact on access to ES. VOI members and individuals who knew VOI committee members had greater access to ES than non-members. Findings show that co-management may be shifting ES access inequalities rather than reducing them, and we outline a number of challenges relating to PA co-management.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
Authors
Caroline Ward, Lindsay Stringer, George Holmes,