Representing is something that we do, not a structure that we “use”: Reply to Gładziejewski

- 8 non-standard but fundamental assumptions necessary for and adequate to understanding interactivism are presented.
- An outline of Gladziejewski's critique of interactivism is presented.
- This critique is itself critiqued on the basis of the 8 fundamental assumptions and their misunderstanding.
- Further clarifications are presented regarding the differences of interactivism with predictive brain models.
- The interactivist understanding of implicit content in contrast to standard correspondence models is also clarified.
- Gladziejewski's alternative proposal, namely his “two-factor theory” is also critiqued.