Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
6934158 | Journal of Informetrics | 2018 | 13 Pages |
Abstract
Do academic journals favor authors who share their institutional affiliation? To answer this question we examine citation counts, as a proxy for paper quality, for articles published in four leading international relations journals during the years 2000-2015. We compare citation counts for articles written by “in-group members” (authors affiliated with the journal's publishing institution) versus “out-group members” (authors not affiliated with that institution). Articles written by in-group authors received 18% to 49% fewer Web of Science citations when published in their home journal (International Security or World Politics) vs. an unaffiliated journal, compared to out-group authors. These results are mainly driven by authors who received their PhDs from Harvard or MIT. The findings show evidence of a bias within some journals towards publishing papers by faculty from their home institution, at the expense of paper quality.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Computer Science
Computer Science Applications
Authors
Yaniv Reingewertz, Carmela Lutmar,