| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7552945 | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences | 2012 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
⺠We discuss claims made by Craver and Woodward on neuroscientific generalizations. ⺠Our case-study is a neuroscientific investigation of rat place cells. ⺠We argue that the authors of the study are not tolerant towards exceptions. ⺠Experimental protocols define what is an “exception” there. ⺠Results may enable one to reflect on the methods of model testing in neuroscience.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
Authors
Edoardo Datteri, Federico Laudisa,