Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7730262 | Journal of Power Sources | 2015 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Li[Ni1/3Mn1/3Co1/3]O2/graphite, Li[Ni0.5Mn0.3Co0.2]O2/graphite and Li[Ni0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2]/graphite pouch cells were examined with and without electrolyte additives using the ultra high precision charger at Dalhousie University, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, gas evolution measurements and “cycle-store” tests. The electrolyte additives tested were vinylene carbonate (VC), prop-1-ene-1,3-sultone (PES), pyridine-boron trifluoride (PBF), 2% PESÂ +Â 1% methylene methanedisulfonate (MMDS)Â +Â 1% tris(trimethylsilyl) phosphite (TTSPi) and 0.5% pyrazine di-boron trifluoride (PRZ)Â +Â 1% MMDS. The charge end-point capacity slippage, capacity fade, coulombic efficiency, impedance change during cycling, gas evolution and voltage drop during “cycle-store” testing were compared to gain an understanding of the effects of these promising electrolyte additives or additive combinations on the different types of pouch cells. It is hoped that this report can be used as a guide or reference for the wise choice of electrolyte additives in Li[Ni1/3Mn1/3Co1/3]O2/graphite, Li[Ni0.5Mn0.3Co0.2]O2/graphite and Li[Ni0.6Mn0.2Co0.2O2]/graphite pouch cells and also to show the shortcomings of particular positive electrode compositions.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemistry
Electrochemistry
Authors
Lin Ma, Julian Self, Mengyun Nie, Stephen Glazier, David Yaohui Wang, Yong-Shou Lin, J.R. Dahn,