| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8059553 | Coastal Engineering | 2018 | 21 Pages | 
Abstract
												For relatively steep beaches incident-band swash cannot be neglected and a wave-resolving simulation mode is required. Therefore in this paper we also test the non-hydrostatic, wave-resolving model within XBeach for runup and overtopping against three datasets. Results for a high-quality flume test show non-hydrostatic XBeach predicts the run-up height with good accuracy (maximum deviation 15%). A case with a very shallow foreshore typical for the Belgian coast at Wenduine was compared against detailed measurements. Overall the model shows correct behavior for this case. Finally, the model is tested against a large number (551) of physical model tests of overtopping from the CLASH database. For relatively high overtopping discharges the non-hydrostatic XBeach performs quite well, with increasing accuracy for increasing overtopping rates. However, for relatively low overtopping rates of less than 10-20 l/m/s, the model systematically underestimates measured overtopping rates.
											Related Topics
												
													Physical Sciences and Engineering
													Engineering
													Ocean Engineering
												
											Authors
												Dano Roelvink, Robert McCall, Seyedabdolhossein Mehvar, Kees Nederhoff, Ali Dastgheib, 
											