Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
8426570 Theriogenology 2018 43 Pages PDF
Abstract
The objectives were to examine the effects of maternal nutrient restriction followed by realimentation during early to mid-gestation on placental development and uterine and umbilical hemodynamics in the beef cow. On day 30 of pregnancy, multiparous, non-lactating beef cows (620.5 ± 11.3 kg) were assigned to 1 of 2 dietary treatments: control (C; 100% National Research Council [NRC] recommendations; n = 18) and restricted (R; 60% NRC; n = 30). On day 85, cows were slaughtered (C, n = 6; R, n = 6), remained on control (CC; n = 12) and restricted (RR; n = 12), or were realimented to control (RC; n = 11). On day 140, cows were slaughtered (CC, n = 6; RR, n = 6; RC, n = 5), remained on control (CCC, n = 6; RCC, n = 5), or were realimented to control (RRC, n = 6). On day 254, all remaining cows were slaughtered. Heart rate and umbilical and uterine hemodynamics [blood flow, resistance index (RI), and pulsatility index (PI)] were determined via Doppler ultrasonography. As expected umbilical blood flow increased and fetal heart rate decreased as gestation advanced. Umbilical PI in RRC cows was less (P = 0.01) compared to RCC and CCC. During late gestation, RCC cows had greater (P = 0.02) ipsilateral and total uterine blood flow vs. CCC and RRC. There was an increase in the number and weight of placentomes from R cows (P ≤ 0.02) compared to C cows (i.e. day 85). There were more placentomes (P = 0.03) in RR vs. CC and RC cows, but placentome weight was not affected (P = 0.18) by maternal dietary treatment at day 140. Maternal nutrient restriction during early to mid-gestation increased the weight (by day 85) and number (day 85 and 140) of placentomes, and did not reduce fetal weight compared to control cows. A longer realimentation period may enhance uterine blood flow and individual placentome size during later gestation, which may compensate for reduced nutrients experienced early in gestation.
Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Animal Science and Zoology
Authors
, , , , ,