Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
8464105 Cryobiology 2018 6 Pages PDF
Abstract
Vitrification of ovarian tissue containing immature oocytes provides an important tool for protecting the endangered species and genetic diversity in aquatic species. Therefore, the main objective was to assess primary growth (PG) oocytes viability following ovarian tissue vitrification using histological analysis, two staining protocols (trypan blue or fluorescein diacetate combined with propidium iodide) and mitochondrial activity assay (MTT assay). In addition, oocyte histomorphometry was performed to evaluate the morphometric parameters after vitrification and the relationship with the occurrence of damage (nucleus and/or membrane) in PG oocytes. There was no significant difference among the vitrified oocytes using trypan blue dye or FDA + IP staining. Oocyte viability assessed using histological analysis showed that vitrification solution 2.0 M Me2SO + 2.5 M etilenoglycol +0.5 M sucrose (VS3; 66.43 ± 4.68%) and 1.5 M methanol + 5.5 M Me2SO + 0.5 M sucrose (VS5; 74.14 ± 3.71%) had the lowest viability rate. Similar results were observed in MTT assay where VS3 (1.63 ± 0.12) and VS5 (1.58 ± 0.09) had the lowest averages when compare with VS1 (2.39 ± 0.14), VS2 (1.78 ± 0.06) and VS4 (2.34 ± 0.19) (P = 0.0002). In membrane damage evaluation by histology, there was no difference among vitrified oocytes and control. However, the highest percentages of nucleus damage were observed in treatments VS3 (26.00 ± 5.55) and VS5 (26.00 ± 5.55). Oocyte diameter did not change after vitrification; however, nucleus diameter was significantly higher in control group (49.03 ± 1.07). Oocyte viability by histological analysis was positive-correlated to the occurrence of nucleus (r2 = 0.78) and membrane (r2 = 0.45) damage after vitrification/warming. The high viability of PG oocytes obtained after ovarian tissue vitrification of Piaractus mesopotamicus suggests that the protocol applied here might be used successfully in other teleost species for food production.
Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
Authors
, , , , , ,