Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
8491266 Animal Feed Science and Technology 2016 8 Pages PDF
Abstract
There is a recent trend to increase phytase dose from the traditional 500 FTU/kg to 750 or 1000 FTU/kg in poultry feed formulations, driven by high inorganic phosphorus prices and more bioefficacious phytases. This paper outlines a method for calculating optimum phytase dose, based on the replacement of inorganic phosphorus through the application of the marginal decision rule. In this 21 day digestibility study 768 male BUT 6 turkey poults were assigned to 8 treatments (6 replications/treatment): a negative control diet based on corn/soy, meeting the nutritional requirements of turkey poults except in phosphorus (0.26% ret P) and calcium (0.8%), 4 graded levels of phytase over the negative control (345, 690, 1035, 1380 FTU/kg), and 3 graded levels of supplemental MCP (0.6, 1.2, 1.8 g P/kg). Significance was determined using ANOVA and means separation for all parameters was achieved using Tukey's HSD. Bodyweight gain was maximised at the 1035 FTU/kg dose, with all levels of phytase supplementations significantly increasing BWG compared to the negative control (P < 0.05). Non-linear regression was conducted on ileal phosphorus digestibility, and optimum phytase dose was determined using the as the point where the incremental value of P release was equal to the incremental phytase cost, assuming the value of incremental P from phytase was equal to the value of the same amount of digestible P from an inorganic source. The optimum dose of phytase under typical 2014 US market price conditions was calculated to be 996 FTU/kg. At 996 FTU/kg, 100% of the potential value of inorganic P replacement was captured, compared to 70% of the value at 500 FTU/kg. Under different phytase and inorganic P price conditions, the optimum dose varied between 762 FTU/kg and 1231 FTU/kg. In conclusion, this study highlights a method that provides a rational justification for use of targeted phytase doses greater than 500 FTU/kg.
Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Animal Science and Zoology
Authors
, , , ,