Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8491351 | Animal Feed Science and Technology | 2015 | 5 Pages |
Abstract
The repeatability of FNIRS spectra and predictions assessed by repeated measurements of the same sample was satisfactory for all tested parameters. For OMD, DMVI, OMVI and the grass and clover proportion of the ingested forage, prediction repeatability was lower than, or similar to, the standard error of cross-validation (SECV) of the FNIRS calibration. The study showed that FNIRS could be a reliable method for predicting the OMD of ruminants, but the prediction of voluntary intake with acceptable error was less satisfactory because of uncertainties in the FNIRS calibration models.
Keywords
OMDSECVSEPfNIRSSECNIRSRMSanalysis of varianceANOVABotanical compositionRepeatabilitystandard error of the meanStandard error of predictionStandard error of calibrationstandard error of cross-validationCoefficient of VariationNear infrared reflectance spectroscopyFaecesDigestibilitySEMIntakeroot mean square
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Animal Science and Zoology
Authors
V. Decruyenaere, V. Planchon, P. Dardenne, D. Stilmant,