Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8494473 | Aquaculture | 2015 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
The authors of this manuscript believe that there is a gap in the literature concerning the relative bioavailability between two prevalent sources of lysine to commercially relevant aquaculture species. Common plant protein ingredients, in particular cereal grain by-products, contain low levels of lysine. In order to formulate economical feeds, feed formulators supplement these primarily plant protein diets with supplemental sources of lysine in order to create economical diets while meeting all nutritional requirements of the animal. As the sources of lysine tested in this study, l-lysine HCl and l-lysine sulfate, are both used in the formulation of aqua feeds the relative ability of these two sources to meet the lysine requirement of rainbow trout (a major species cultured in Canada) will allow for feed formulators to use economic feed ingredients, while being confident the source of supplemental lysine they are using (either l-lysine HCl or l-lysine sulfate) will be used equally well to meet the fishes' lysine requirement.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Aquatic Science
Authors
Christopher D. Powell, M.A. Kabir Chowdhury, Dominique P. Bureau,