Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8506769 | Food and Waterborne Parasitology | 2017 | 13 Pages |
Abstract
These risk ranking methods for foodborne parasites are increasingly performed to aid priority setting at global, regional, and national levels. As different stakeholders have their own prioritization objectives and beliefs, the outcome of such exercises is necessarily context-dependent. Therefore, when designing a risk ranking exercise for foodborne parasites, it is important to choose the metrics and methods, as well as what to rank, in the light of the predefined context of the question being addressed and the target audience.
Keywords
WTAGBDMCDAWTPQALYDALYYLDYLLGlobal burden of diseaseMulti-Criteria Decision AnalysisPriority settingwillingness-to-acceptWillingness-to-payWorld Health OrganizationFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nationsquality-adjusted life yeardisability-adjusted life yearDisability-Adjusted Life YearsFAOCost-of-illnessWHO
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
Authors
Brecht Devleesschauwer, Martijn Bouwknegt, Pierre Dorny, Sarah Gabriël, Arie H. Havelaar, Sophie Quoilin, Lucy J. Robertson, Niko Speybroeck, Paul R. Torgerson, Joke W.B. van der Giessen, Chiara Trevisan,