Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
87201 | Forest Ecology and Management | 2012 | 10 Pages |
Management of federal public forests to meet sustainability goals and multiple use regulations is an immense challenge. To succeed, we suggest use of formal decision science procedures and tools in the context of structured decision making (SDM). SDM entails four stages: problem structuring (framing the problem and defining objectives and evaluation criteria), problem analysis (defining alternatives, evaluating likely consequences, identifying key uncertainties, and analyzing tradeoffs), decision point (identifying the preferred alternative), and implementation and monitoring the preferred alternative with adaptive management feedbacks. We list a wide array of models, techniques, and tools available for each stage, and provide three case studies of their selected use in National Forest land management and project plans. Successful use of SDM involves participation by decision-makers, analysts, scientists, and stakeholders. We suggest specific areas for training and instituting SDM to foster transparency, rigor, clarity, and inclusiveness in formal decision processes regarding management of national forests.
► Structured decision making can help in management of forest and grassland ecosystems. ► We list a wide array of models, techniques, and tools available for each SDM stage. ► We discuss three case studies of SDM use in land management and project plans. ► Successful use needs input by decision-makers, analysts, scientists, and stakeholders. ► Use of SDM fosters clearness, rigor, clarity, and inclusiveness in forest management.