Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
8845292 Ecological Indicators 2018 11 Pages PDF
Abstract
There is an increasing interest in considering ecosystem processes after fen restoration, and not solely species composition. To evaluate the success of ecological restoration, comparisons with targets from reference ecosystems are required. We documented net primary production (NPP) and decomposition of the main vegetation components in order to describe a reference data set for ecological restoration of moderately rich to rich minerotrophic peatlands (fens) in southeastern Canada. Data collection included three growing seasons for herbs and shrubs and two growing seasons for belowground biomass, trees and bryophytes. Average NPP for above and belowground biomass of three selected natural basin fens were 450 g m−2 yr−1. Belowground NPP represented 45% of the total NPP. Sphagnum warnstorfii was the most productive bryophyte (140 g m−2 yr−1) and the slowest plant species to decompose (exponential decomposition constant k = 0.07 yr−1). The brown mosses Tomenthypnum nitens, Campylium stellatum and Scorpidium cossonii had a NPP of 79, 69 and 92 g m−2 yr−1, respectively, and decomposed at the same rate (identical k values of 0.14 yr−1). Trees covered a large surface area in the fens, with an average NPP of 73 g m−2 yr−1. S. warnstorfii contributed to hummocks having a higher peat accumulation potential than lawn vegetation. The graminoid Trichophorum cespitosum significantly increased NPP in lawns and should be targeted in restoration plans for fens. To restore peat accumulating processes (production and decomposition) in fens, bryophytes should be the primary focus for re-introduction, specifically species that are adapted to living in drier conditions, such as hummock species. The range of variability for NPP and decomposition established by this study should be considered as a decision tool in restoration projects to monitor restored ecosystems trajectories and successes.
Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Authors
, ,