Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
8985708 | The Professional Animal Scientist | 2005 | 4 Pages |
Abstract
One hundred twelve Holstein steers (115 ± 5 kg) were used in a 167-d performance trial. Two forage sources [rice straw vs sudangrass (SG) hay] and two levels of fibrolytic enzyme supplementation (0 vs 0.17% Yeasture®, Cenzone Tech, Inc., San Marcos, CA) were evaluated in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement. Experimental diets (steam-flaked, corn-based) contained 15% (DM basis) forage. Forages were ground to pass through a 2.5-cm screen prior to incorporation into completely mixed diets. Fibrolytic enzyme supplementation did not affect (P> 0.20) cattle performance. Forage source did not affect (P>0.20) ADG; however, DMI tended (P=0.14) to be slightly (2%) greater for the diets containing rice straw. Dietary NEm and NEg were greater (3 and 5%, respectively; P<0.05) for the SG diets than for rice straw diets. Given that the NEm value of SG was 1.11 Mcal/kg, the replacement NEm and NEg values for ground rice straw were 0.65 and 0.16 Mcal/kg, respectively; tabular values from the NRC (1984) for NEm and NEg were 0.64 and 0.11 Mcal/kg, respectively. We concluded that ground rice straw is a highly palatable forage source and can be included as the sole roughage source in high energy, growing-finishing diets at levels of up to approximately 15% (DM) without reducing energy intake and ADG of calf-fed Holstein steers. Fibrolytic enzyme supplementation did not enhance the feeding value of either SG or rice straw under the conditions of this study.
Keywords
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Animal Science and Zoology
Authors
R.A. Ware, J.F. Calderon, L. MD, R.A. Zinn,