Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
90453 | Forest Ecology and Management | 2007 | 9 Pages |
Fitzroya cupressoides (Cupressaceae) is an endemic and long-lived conifer of southern Chile and Argentina (40–43° S). This species has been subject to continuous exploitation since the 16th century, causing extensive population decline. Historically, the main labour force for the exploitation of F. cupressoides (alerce) was the indigenous Mapuche-Huilliche population, first under the command of the Spanish settlers and later, of non-indigenous Chileans. In coastal forests, timber of alerce has been harvested by Huilliche communities as well as by Chilean and international forestry companies. Records of the regeneration of this pioneer tree after exploitation in the Andean mountains have generally shown limited regeneration depending on the intensity of harvest. Because indigenous exploitation does not use machinery for timber harvesting, and is supposedly less utilitarian than commercial harvest, I propose that areas in the Coastal Range harvested by Huilliche communities should present higher regeneration of alerce than areas harvested by forestry companies. To test this hypothesis, I sampled 10 stands harvested and abandoned by forestry companies and 10 stands harvested by Huilliche communities in the coastal range of the Osorno Province (41° S, 400–800 m). In each stand, I estimated the density of regeneration (sapling stage), number of stumps, number of live adults, and the number of standing and fallen dead alerce. Each stand was characterized by elevation, forest-type, incidence of fire, and vegetation cover. Results showed that forests harvested by Huilliches had higher numbers of live, remnant adult trees with a dbh ≥ 60 cm than forests harvested by timber companies. The number of stumps with a dbh ≥60 cm was significantly higher in stands harvested by timber companies than in Huilliche stands. Despite large differences in sapling densities among stands, regeneration density of alerce was unrelated to the type of harvest used by indigenous people or forestry companies.