| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91603 | Forest Policy and Economics | 2013 | 11 Pages |
Forest certification has become a key driver in efforts towards sustainable forest management. Certification processes include commitments to respect the rights of Aboriginal peoples. However, there has been little investigation into the relationship between certification and Aboriginal rights. This paper examines the effectiveness of certification in addressing a range of First Nation concerns, taking the example of FSC's National Boreal Standard, applied in the provinces of Quebec and Ontario, Canada. This is done through documentary analysis of audit reports for all public land certificates in this region, with particular attention paid to ‘conditions’ (required changes) issued as part of the audit process. Results indicate that 86% of FSC certifications led to at least one condition relating to First Nations' rights, but that most were deemed minor. The two most common issues flagged by conditions were: agreement for the management plan and the evaluation and protection of First Nations' resources and sites. Analysis of subsequent reports revealed that all conditions were resolved within the allotted time period. A qualitative analysis of conditions revealed a tendency for auditors to accept partial conformance when evaluating compliance. We conclude that FSC certification is pushing forest managers to make progress on a wide variety of fronts, but through a lens of ‘continual improvement’ rather than strict conformance with the standard.
► We examine the effectiveness of certification in addressing First Nations concerns. ► Study covers FSC certificates issued in boreal regions of Ontario and Quebec. ► 86% of certificates have at least one condition relating to First Nations rights. ► We observed a tendency for auditors to accept partial conformance with standard. ► FSC is pushing forest managers to improve relations with First Nations.
