Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
918024 Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2015 16 Pages PDF
Abstract

•We investigated if and when children deny that they can perceive an agent whose eyes are covered.•The findings show that young children have a mutualistic conception of seeing persons.•Children perceive a difference in meaning between ’see’ and ’look’.•The findings stand in conflict with the idea of childhood egocentrism.•Children’s knowledge of the pronoun ’each other’ is linked to their demand of mutual gaze.

Previous research has shown that young children deny being able to see an agent whose eyes are covered. The current study explored this phenomenon further. In Experiment 1, 3-year-olds denied that they could “see,” but affirmed that they could “look at,” a doll whose eyes were covered—indicating that they demand mutuality for seeing another but not for looking at another. In Experiment 2, 3.5-year-olds drew the same distinction between “see” and “look at” when facing a doll or a human. A strong correlation between children’s knowledge of the reciprocal pronoun “each other” and their adherence to the mutuality demand was found. The results are discussed with respect to children’s bias for second personal encounters and children’s relational concept of persons.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Psychology Developmental and Educational Psychology
Authors
, , , , ,