Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
93281 | Land Use Policy | 2012 | 8 Pages |
In controlling diseases, governments take actions that denigrate property interests. Losses by property owners under a citrus canker eradication program led to a legal challenge concerning the Florida state government's authority to destroy property without compensation. A court adopted time-based rights to determine when the state needed to pay for property destroyed. Time-based rights have also been adopted by state legislatures to limit nuisance actions against agricultural producers. This paper addresses the adoption of time-based rights to determine whether the changes from space-based to time-based rights provide a superior response for eradicating plant diseases and responding to nuisances. The changes are projected to lead to different producer responses which in turn will affect agricultural production.
► We examine who should pay for the destruction of property in controlling a disease. ► Governments may destroy property in emergencies and to prevent public nuisances. ► Courts and legislatures may define time-based or space-based property rights. ► Time-based rights have been adopted to limit nuisance actions against agricultural producers. ► Legislative assignments of time-based property rights may diminish social welfare.