Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
93339 Land Use Policy 2012 16 Pages PDF
Abstract

Like most EU and US planning systems, planning in Israel aims to promote certainty regarding future development by employing statutory land-use plans for stabilizing and binding the development of land use. In Israel, district planning from the 1980s onwards took place in the form of long-term land-use plans. However, in practice, Israeli planning witnessed a movement toward discretionary-oriented decision-making, providing for revisions of the land-use plans and subsequently diminishing its efficacy. A pending reform suggests eliminating district land-use plans and absorbing them into national and local plans. Concerning the debate on the future of the Israeli planning system, this research aims to assess the gap between certainty-oriented regulation and actual development, often occurring on a case-by-case basis. Our aim is to evaluate the actual performance of a district land-use plan, focusing particularly on aspects of land-use. Remote Sensing and GIS-based Plan Implementation Evaluation (PIE) analysis was used to test the impact of a comprehensive outline plan for Israel's Central District on the actual development of the built environment. The results show fundamental gaps between the original land-use assignments of the district plan and actual development. The limited effectiveness of regulatory land-use planning for complex, densely populated districts is then discussed in line with the certainty–flexibility dilemma in land-use planning and the structure of planning decision-making in Israel.

► Remote Sensing and GIS-based methods provided a long term PIE assessment of outline plans. ► Fundamental gaps between original land-use assignments of a district plan and actual development. ► PIE spots accumulation of amendments to the plan, originally designed to restrict development. ► Development nonconforming to one district plan was incorporated by the following district plan.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Forestry
Authors
, , ,