Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
9467425 | Agricultural Water Management | 2005 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
Grass reference evapotranspiration (ETO) was determined by using the FAO Penman-Monteith method utilizing the agrometeorological parameters measured at the study site. The crop coefficient (KC) was determined as the ratio of ETC to ETO. The tomato crop coefficients were determined following the FAO crop coefficient model. The average crop coefficient during the midseason growth stage (KCÂ mid) was 0.82 which is far below the adjusted FAO crop coefficient of 1.19 by about 31%. Also, the late season crop coefficient (KCÂ end) was much lower than the adjusted FAO crop coefficient of 0.76 by about 40%. Moreover, the weighted average crop coefficient over the entire growing season (KCÂ GS) was 0.69, which is about 36% lower than the FAO corresponding value. In fact, the low KC values obtained reflect the effect of practicing both localized drip irrigation and plastic mulch covering. This study showed that there is a big difference between the reported FAO crop coefficients and the one measured in the filed using a precise approach. These exact updated values of crop coefficients will enhance future estimation of crop water requirements and hence irrigation management of tomato crop which is the major irrigated crop in the Jordan Valley.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Agronomy and Crop Science
Authors
Jumah Amayreh, Nassim Al-Abed,