Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2039755 Cell Reports 2014 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Inherently invasive and poorly invasive melanoma subpopulations co-invade•Leader cells are inherently invasive and provide MT1-MMP and deposit ECM•Follower cells affect the mode of invasion and thereby elicit protease dependency•Cooperative invasion bypasses phenotype switching and maintains tumor heterogeneity

SummaryClonal selection and transcriptional reprogramming (e.g., epithelial-mesenchymal transition or phenotype switching) are the predominant theories thought to underlie tumor progression. However, a “division of labor” leading to cooperation among tumor-cell subpopulations could be an additional catalyst of progression. Using a zebrafish-melanoma xenograft model, we found that in a heterogeneous setting, inherently invasive cells, which possess protease activity and deposit extracellular matrix (ECM), co-invade with subpopulations of poorly invasive cells, a phenomenon we term “cooperative invasion”. Whereas the poorly invasive cells benefit from heterogeneity, the invasive cells switch from protease-independent to an MT1-MMP-dependent mode of invasion. We did not observe changes in expression of the melanoma phenotype determinant MITF during cooperative invasion, thus ruling out the necessity for phenotype switching for invasion. Altogether, our data suggest that cooperation can drive melanoma progression without the need for clonal selection or phenotype switching and can account for the preservation of heterogeneity seen throughout tumor progression.

Graphical AbstractFigure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide

Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
Authors
, , , , , ,