Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2040282 Cell Reports 2013 14 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Basophils and eosinophils, but not neutrophils, derive from the erythro-myeloid lineage•Hematopoietic progenitors with long-term potential reside in the CD133+/CD34+ fraction•Most progenitors with erythroid potential reside in the CD133low/CD34+ fraction•Cultured CD133+/CD34+ cells lose erythro-myeloid but retain SCID-repopulating potential

SummaryThe classical model of hematopoiesis predicts a dichotomous lineage restriction of multipotent hematopoietic progenitors (MPPs) into common lymphoid progenitors (CLPs) and common myeloid progenitors (CMPs). However, this idea has been challenged by the identification of lymphoid progenitors retaining partial myeloid potential (e.g., LMPPs), implying that granulocytes can arise within both the classical lymphoid and the myeloid branches. Here, we resolve this issue by using cell-surface CD133 expression to discriminate functional progenitor populations. We show that eosinophilic and basophilic granulocytes as well as erythrocytes and megakaryocytes derive from a common erythro-myeloid progenitor (EMP), whereas neutrophilic granulocytes arise independently within a lympho-myeloid branch with long-term progenitor function. These findings challenge the concept of a CMP and restore dichotomy to the classical hematopoietic model.

Graphical AbstractFigure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide

Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
Authors
, , , , , , ,