Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
7530009 | Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen | 2015 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
In the light of all data records and satisfaction sheets, the IQM peer review has become well-established over the last five years. Possible reasons are a well-defined framework, clear structures and different kinds of support. The success of the cooperation of the German Medical Association and IQM is illustrated by the development of the curriculum peer review. Re-reviews provide impulses for sustainability. At any rate, there is a need for scientific evaluation of the peer review method in order to generate evidence for this important tool of quality improvement.
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Public Health and Health Policy
Authors
Maria Eberlein-Gonska, Anita Budic, Claudia Winklmair, Thomas Petzold,