Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
4366201 International Journal of Food Microbiology 2016 7 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Six micromolar PMA is optimum at 106–7 CFU/mL (yeast) & 107–8 CFU/mL (bacteria).•Concentrations ≤ 3 μM PMA resulted in detection of non-viable cells.•Taxonomic differences in susceptibility to PMA may be due to cell morphology.

Culture-independent methods of microbial identification have been developed, which allow for DNA extraction directly from environmental samples without subjecting microbes to growth on nutrient media. These methods often involve next generation DNA sequencing (NGS) for identifying microbes and qPCR for quantifying them. Despite the benefits of extracting all DNA from the sample, results may be compromised by amplifying DNA from dead cells. To address this short-coming, the use of propidium monoazide (PMA) has been used to deactivate DNA in non-viable cells. Nevertheless, its optimization has not been fully explored under a variety of conditions. In this study, we optimized the PMA method for both yeasts and bacteria. Specifically, we explored the effect different PMA concentrations and different cell densities had on DNA amplification (as part of next generation DNA sequencing) from both dead and viable bacterial and yeast cells. We found PMA was effective in eliminating DNA that was associated with dead yeast and bacterial cells for all cell concentrations. Nevertheless, DNA (extracted from viable yeast and bacterial cells) amplified most abundantly when PMA concentration was at 6 μM and when yeast densities ranged between 106 to 107 CFU/mL and bacterial densities were approximately 108 CFU/mL.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Food Science
Authors
, , , ,