Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
5850517 Food and Chemical Toxicology 2014 14 Pages PDF
Abstract

•OECD 28-day inhalation study: Histopathology was combined with transcriptomics.•Histopathological changes correlated with biological network perturbation.•Tissue-specific impact on network perturbation was quantified.•Reduced biological activity of a MRTP compared to 3R4F was demonstrated.•Network-based approach facilitates systems toxicology-based risk assessment.

Towards a systems toxicology-based risk assessment, we investigated molecular perturbations accompanying histopathological changes in a 28-day rat inhalation study combining transcriptomics with classical histopathology. We demonstrated reduced biological activity of a prototypic modified risk tobacco product (pMRTP) compared with the reference research cigarette 3R4F. Rats were exposed to filtered air or to three concentrations of mainstream smoke (MS) from 3R4F, or to a high concentration of MS from a pMRTP. Histopathology revealed concentration-dependent changes in response to 3R4F that were irritative stress-related in nasal and bronchial epithelium, and inflammation-related in the lung parenchyma. For pMRTP, significant changes were seen in the nasal epithelium only. Transcriptomics data were obtained from nasal and bronchial epithelium and lung parenchyma. Concentration-dependent gene expression changes were observed following 3R4F exposure, with much smaller changes for pMRTP. A computational-modeling approach based on causal models of tissue-specific biological networks identified cell stress, inflammation, proliferation, and senescence as the most perturbed molecular mechanisms. These perturbations correlated with histopathological observations. Only weak perturbations were observed for pMRTP. In conclusion, a correlative evaluation of classical histopathology together with gene expression-based computational network models may facilitate a systems toxicology-based risk assessment, as shown for a pMRTP.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Food Science
Authors
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,