Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
6398084 Food Research International 2013 7 Pages PDF
Abstract

Five wines obtained from the same grape variety and viticultural zone were analyzed by gas chromatographic (GC), chemical (CA) and electronic nose (E-Nose) techniques. The principal component (PC) analysis based on the concentration of 11 volatile compounds, volatile acidity, ethanol, glycerol and 2,3-butanediol provides 2 PCs allowing 5 different groups to be established. Nevertheless 4 different groups of wines were obtained by means of the first 2 PCs from E-Nose data. Wines with an ethanol content of 18% (v/v) and different concentration in ethyl esters were not discriminated by the E-Nose, showing that new sensors will be required for its differentiation. A good linear correlation (R = 0.909) was obtained between a combination of the PCs from the E-Nose data and those from GC-CA. The E-Nose is revealed as a rapid tool to differentiate among wines obtained by different elaboration techniques, helping to protect the quality of wines produced in the Protected Denominations of Origin.

► Five wine types were differentiated using their composition in major wine-volatiles. ► Only 4 groups for the 5 wine types were differentiated by the electronic nose. ► The electronic nose cannot differentiate wines with similar sensorial characteristics. ► A linear relation between composition in wine-volatiles and E-Nose was established. ► E-Nose is a powerful tool for the classification of commercial sherry type wines.

Related Topics
Life Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences Food Science
Authors
, , , , ,