| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8589022 | Journal of Ethnic Foods | 2017 | 8 Pages | 
Abstract
												We conclude that our four GI cases do not represent “museums of production” or overly fixed perceptions of history. However, the collective action of the producer group has resulted in dynamic local cultivation practices without restricting innovation. The GI status has rather resulted in the protection of local farmers' collective action and old varieties than in the protection of old production methods.
											Related Topics
												
													Life Sciences
													Agricultural and Biological Sciences
													Food Science
												
											Authors
												Katharina Gugerell, Yuta Uchiyama, Pia R. Kieninger, Marianne Penker, Shuichiro Kajima, Ryo Kohsaka, 
											