کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
10495774 | 941791 | 2005 | 20 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Assessing the authoritativeness of Canadian and American health documents: a comparative analysis using informetric methodologies
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی
مدیریت، کسب و کار و حسابداری
کسب و کار، مدیریت و حسابداری (عمومی)
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
چکیده انگلیسی
Government publications have long been considered authoritative sources of information regardless of the format (electronic via the WWW or paper) they are published in, and with little consideration as to how they are researched and written. Given the greater accessibility that the WWW provides the public to this very important source of information on a wide variety of subjects, assessing authoritativeness becomes a bigger and more difficult issue. The research and comparative analysis presented here continues a pilot study that applies informetric methods, especially citation analysis, to assess whether the blind trust afforded government publications is appropriate in such an important area of public policy and to see whether the two different types of health systems in Canada and the United States might have an effect on how these publications are produced.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Government Information Quarterly - Volume 22, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 277-296
Journal: Government Information Quarterly - Volume 22, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 277-296
نویسندگان
Frank Lambert,