کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1160252 | 1490340 | 2013 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
This paper investigates the difficulty of protecting industrial design within the framework of intellectual property law. By 1914, British law offered protection to patentable inventions, registered designs, copyright and trademarks, and an established procedure for compensating patentees whose inventions (or registered designs) were used by the state. However, the law understood “design” to refer to the decorative arts, not to the design of complex pieces of machinery, such as airplanes, cars or ships, and the rapid development of aeronautical engineering and aircraft production during the First World War would highlight this lacuna. In the early 1920s, following adversarial hearings before the Royal Commission on Awards to Inventors, large awards (over £20,000) were made to ten firms in the aviation industry, in compensation for the wartime use of their designs or patents by other government contractors. The paper analyses these cases, to shed light on the problem of identifying “intellectual property” in a complex design, in particular, where a firm developed a series of aircraft that shared major features one with another.
► Aircraft manufacturers were chief beneficiaries of 1920s Royal Commission’s awards.
► The Royal Commission struggled to define intellectual property in aircraft designs.
► The UK government compensated firms for wartime designs and loss of trade secrets.
► Aeronautical engineers’ importance was recognized, absent sound aerodynamic theory.
Journal: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A - Volume 44, Issue 2, June 2013, Pages 269–279