کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1160518 | 1490351 | 2010 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Understanding is not simulating: a reply to Gibbs and Perlman
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی
علوم انسانی و هنر
تاریخ
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
چکیده انگلیسی
In this response, I do four things. First, I defend the claim that the action compatibility effect does not distinguish between embodied and traditional accounts of language comprehension. Second, I present neuroimaging and neuropsychological results that seem to support the traditional account. Third, I argue that metaphorical language poses no special challenge to the arguments I gave against embodied theories of comprehension. Fourth, I lay out the architecture of language I advocate and suggest the sorts of data that would decide between traditional and embodied accounts.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A - Volume 41, Issue 3, September 2010, Pages 309-312
Journal: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A - Volume 41, Issue 3, September 2010, Pages 309-312
نویسندگان
Daniel A. Weiskopf,