Diagnostic accuracy, reproducibility and robustness of fibrosis blood tests in chronic hepatitis C: A meta-analysis with individual data

ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of liver fibrosis tests and its influencing factors in a meta-analysis with individual data.Design and methodsFour independent centers provided four blood tests and Metavir staging from 825 patients with chronic hepatitis C.ResultsFibroMeter AUROC (0.840) for significant fibrosis was superior to those of Fibrotest (0.803, p = 0.049), APRI (0.789, p = 0.001) and Hepascore (0.781, p < 0.001). The misclassification rate was lower for FibroMeter (23%) than for Fibrotest and Hepascore (both 28%, p < 0.001). The variation in the diagnostic cut-offs of tests among centers, reflecting the overall reproducibility, was: FibroMeter: 4.2%, APRI: 24.0%, Fibrotest: 24.2%, Hepascore: 35.0%. Accordingly, the proportion of patients diagnosed with significant fibrosis changed: FibroMeter: 0.8%, Hepascore: 2.4% (p = 0.02 vs FibroMeter), Fibrotest: 5.8% (p < 10− 3), APRI: 18.2% (p < 10− 3).ConclusionsThis study on clinical applicability shows significant differences in diagnostic accuracy, inter-center reproducibility, and robustness of biomarkers to changes in population characteristics between blood tests.