کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2022977 | 1542426 | 2010 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: C-terminal processing of GABARAP is not required for trafficking of the angiotensin II type 1A receptor C-terminal processing of GABARAP is not required for trafficking of the angiotensin II type 1A receptor](/preview/png/2022977.png)
ObjectiveGABARAP, a small (117 aa) trafficking protein, binds to the C-terminal, cytoplasmic domain of rat angiotensin type-1A receptor (AT1R), the predominant effector of the octapeptide angiotensin II (Ang II) (Cook et al., Circ. Res. 2008;102:1539–47). The objectives of this study were to map the interaction domains of GABARAP and AT1R, to determine the effect of GABARAP association on AT1R signaling activity, and to determine the importance of post-translational processing of GABARAP on accumulation of AT1R on the plasma membrane and its signaling function.ResultsDeletion analysis identified two regions within GABARAP necessary for interaction with AT1R in yeast two-hybrid assays: 1) a domain comprised of residues 32–51 that is nearly identical to that involved in binding and intracellular trafficking of the GABAA receptor and 2) a domain encompassing the C-terminal 21 aa. The GABARAP interaction domain of AT1R was delimited to the 15 aa immediately downstream of the last membrane spanning region. Overexpression of GABARAP in rat adrenal pheochromocytoma PC-12 cells increased the cell-surface expression of AT1R and Ang II-dependent activation of the cAMP signaling pathway. Residues within AT1R necessary for these responses were identified by mutational analysis. In PC-12 cells, GABARAP was constitutively and quantitatively cleaved at the C-terminus peptide bond and this cleavage was prevented by mutation of Gly116. Wild-type GABARAP and the G116A mutant were, however, equally effective in stimulating AT1R surface expression and signaling activity.ConclusionsGABARAP and AT1R interact through discrete domains and this association regulates the cell-surface accumulation and, consequently, ligand-induced function of the receptor. Unlike that observed with the GABAA receptor, this regulation is not dependent on C-terminal processing and modification of GABARAP.
Journal: Regulatory Peptides - Volume 159, Issues 1–3, 8 January 2010, Pages 78–86