کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2436549 1553738 2006 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Estimating the true prevalence of Fasciola hepatica in cattle slaughtered in Switzerland in the absence of an absolute diagnostic test
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری ایمنی شناسی و میکروب شناسی انگل شناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Estimating the true prevalence of Fasciola hepatica in cattle slaughtered in Switzerland in the absence of an absolute diagnostic test
چکیده انگلیسی

A survey of 1,331 cattle presented for slaughter at two abattoirs in Switzerland was used to estimate the true prevalence of Fasciola hepatica infection and the diagnostic parameters of visual meat inspection, coproscopy after sedimentation technique, a commercial ELISA test for specific antibody detection in serum and the post mortem microscopic detection of eggs in bile. Faeces, blood and the gall bladder were taken from most cattle presented for slaughter. In addition, livers that were rejected by the meat inspectors were also dissected to examine for the presence of liver fluke. Bayesian techniques (Markov Chain–Monte Carlo) were used to estimate the diagnostic parameters of each of these procedures and the true prevalence of bovine fasciolosis. The true prevalence of F. hepatica infection was estimated at 18.0% (95% credible intervals 15.9–20.3%). The diagnostic sensitivity of coproscopy, bile examination, antibody ELISA and meat inspection were estimated at 69.0% (57.3–79.7%), 93.4% (88.0–97.5%), 91.7% (87.2–95.2%) and 63.2% (55.6–70.6%), respectively. The diagnostic specificity of the ELISA test was estimated at 93.7% (91.7–95.2%). These results demonstrate that the prevalence of bovine fasciolosis is higher than previously thought due to the low sensitivity of meat inspection. They also demonstrate that traditional coproscopy can be very efficient if there is repeated sampling, resulting in sensitivity of approximately 92%.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: International Journal for Parasitology - Volume 36, Issues 10–11, September 2006, Pages 1153–1158
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , ,