کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2447422 | 1109503 | 2012 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Ad libitum versus step-up feeding during late lactation: The effect on feed consumption, body composition and production performance in dry fed loose housed sows Ad libitum versus step-up feeding during late lactation: The effect on feed consumption, body composition and production performance in dry fed loose housed sows](/preview/png/2447422.png)
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of ad libitum feeding versus a step-up feeding strategy during late lactation on sows' feed consumption, body composition and production performance. This on-farm study was conducted on 155 loose housed Norwegian Landrace×Swedish Yorkshire sows and their litters, originating from three batches of farrowing. The lactation feed contained 9.86 MJ NE/kg feed and 8.26 g lysine/kg feed and daily feed allowance was recorded. Measurements of sow body weight, body condition score, litter size and litter weight were taken within 24 h after birth and at weaning. Body weight, litter size and litter weight were also recorded on day 21 for sows farrowing in batches 2 and 3. Sows in batches 1 and 2 were backfat measured prefarrowing and at weaning. The study design was a randomized block design with 1st parity, 2nd parity and ≥3rd parity as blocks. Within block sows were randomly allotted to feeding strategy. “Feed refusal” was defined as a drop in feed intake of >3 kg for ≥3 days. Feeding strategy did not affect daily or total feed consumption, weight loss, backfat loss or litter gain. The ad libitum group had a lower feed consumption in week four of lactation (p<0.05) and more feed refusals (p<0.01). The relative backfat loss (%) tended to be higher in the ad libitum group (p<0.1), and backfat loss in the loin was higher in older sows (≥3rd parity) in this group (p<0.05). Parity affected daily, weekly and total feed consumption, with 1st and 2nd parity sows consuming less than older sows (p<0.0001). First parity sows had more feed refusals (p<0.01), higher weight loss (p<0.05) and lower litter gain (p<0.001) than older sows. The relative weight loss (%) was higher in 1st and 2nd parity sows compared to older sows (p<0.05). Positive correlations were found between total feed consumption and litter gain (r=0.45, p<0.0001), body condition and weight loss (r=0.46, p<0.0001), backfat before parturition and total backfat loss (r=0.67, p<0.0001) and body condition and backfat (r=0.55, p<0.0001). A negative correlation was found between total feed consumption and weight loss during the three first weeks of lactation. (r=−0.66, p<0.0001). Parity affects feed consumption, body composition and production, and caution should be taken not to overexert young sows during lactation. A higher risk of feed refusal and more individual variation in the ad libitum group favours the step-up strategy.
Journal: Livestock Science - Volume 149, Issue 3, November 2012, Pages 250–259